On 5 May, Amy Lenzo (*) gave an online masterclass on “Hosting and harvesting online VS physical” to the community of practitioners of the Art of Hosting at the European Commission (**). My takeaways (actually apply to any online session):
“It’s not a question of technology, it’s a question of relationships”
- 90% of your experience, skills, practice as organiser of physical events can be transposed into online events. Reassuring, isn’t it?
- The quality of your presence, trust and how you hold space, are just as important online as in the physical world
- Never host alone an online session, be part of an hosting team
- The hosting team must consist of at least one process host and one tech host (for all technical aspects) or more for large groups
- The use of the camera is mandatory for speakers, and highly recommended for all participants (with muted mikes)
- To keep participants’ attention, speakers can only use the visible/audible part of their body language: their face and their voice. Then, it’s crucial to smile with the whole face and to have a catchy tone and rhythm of voice
- Keep in mind that everything is amplified online: your voice, your unconscious bias, space and time.
This was also my first live graphic recording using the Procreate app (***). Only a few days after installing it on my tablet (it’s crazy, I know, but I like these challenges). My first learnings to start with Procreate:
- Many years of experience with layers on Photoshop has helped me a lot. If you’re not familiar with layers, take time to learn how they work and to play with them
- Select your fave brushes in advance. You can waste precious time looking for what you need during a live event. Mine were Technical pen, Acrylic and Wet Acrylic, and Hard Airbrush (I still have to learn how to have them available in one click)
- Select your fave colours in advance for the same reason as for the tools (I still have to learn how to create my colour palette in advance)
- Know the undo/redo gestures
(*) Amy Lenzo on Linkedin – Twitter
(**) At the European Commission, the Art of Hosting is called the Art of Participatory Leadership
I was invited once again by my colleagues of DG REGIO, European Commission, to visually record the two-day meeting of the European funds communicators (the so-called INFORM-INIO networks). More than 250 communicators from across Europe gathered in the magnificent Augustinian cloister in Ghent, Belgium, to discuss the future of Cohesion Policy, learn and share the best practices to communicate the benefits of the EU funds to citizens.
I thank my colleagues for inviting me to each of the biannual meetings since 2017.
Since this first time we noticed, in the results of the after-event survey, that the graphic recording has become one of the most appreciated elements by participants. The many positive feedback I receive from them during the two days only confirm these results. It proves to me that hand-made visuals have a noticeable impact on people, combining emotions and information.
That all those who took the time to come and talk to me are also thanked.
See all my photos of the INFORM-INIO meeting and from the previous editions since 2014.
Ghent is “the most beautiful city in the world” said its mayor. Judge by yourself:
Read also my post at INFORM-INIO meeting in 2017.
What a great experience it was to be graphic recorder at the “EU interinstitutional workshop on data visualisation” organised by Publications Office of the European Union on 13 November 2019 in Luxembourg. With Célia Pessaud, Catherine Focant, and Vincent Henin, we lively scribed the parallel sessions of the conference.
It was exciting to visually scribe workshops and talks on data visualisation. We – graphic recorders and data visualisers – speak the same visual language, use the same visual grammar, rely on the same conviction that visuals are one of the most powerful mean to explain complex ideas. As as said to some speakers:
We find that there are many similarities between our practice of graphic recording and yours of data visualisation. If the raw data that you visualise is often – if not always – numbers, and more and more big data, for us, raw data is what is said and what is happening in the conference room. Both can be complex and be meaningless at first glance. Our common goal is then to make sense with what does not seem to have any, to offer this sense/meaning to our clients so that they can make good use of it, so that they can benefit from this knowledge unveiled with more clarity. One difference that I see between our practices is that while during the process of DataViz there is time to test and adapt the final visualisation (and it’s recommended by the speakers here), in the graphic recording process everything is done live on the spot: listening, then filtering, then summarising, then translation to the visual language. Without opportunity to test and adapt.
There are certainly synergies that can be established between our two communities to learn from each other’s.
The day ended with a fascinating session on how #dataviz helps us to better “see” black holes. Big thanks to Barthélémy von Haller and Jeremi Niedziela from CERN and Oliver James from DNEG. They guided us through this wonderful journey from the smallest elements of quantum physics to the black holes and their representation in the Interstellar movie. Magnificent presentation that shows that synergies between science and art can increase our knowledge about the unknown.
More information about the conference with all graphic recordings of the team is available on op.europa.eu/en/web/eudataviz/home