“Sensemaking is the process by which people interpret, understand & give meaning to complex, ambiguous or unexpected situations. Figuring out “What’s going on” & “What should we do next”.
Under Maria Scordialos’ wise guidance, colleagues from DG HR, JRC and EC Centre for Organisational Transformation explored what sensemaking means in times of complexity and uncertainty. It starts with listening to people’s stories on a shared topic. Then we look for patterns, map them, and discover patterns within patterns until insights begin to emerge, sometimes pointing to what we should do next. What stayed with me most is this: the stories must be told by the people at the heart of the issue, and explored together with them. Sensemaking is a collective process that draws on the group’s shared intelligence, the more diverse the group, the richer the insights. And one more thing: even an impromptu graphic recording like mine can help people make sense of conversations on complex topics.
Looking back at an event I recently attended at Visuality EU. Entitled “Teams on Track”, the focus of the day was conflict(s), whether underlying or already out in the open. The morning featured a keynote by Professor Martin C. Euwema, followed by practical workshops in the afternoon. My main takeaway (which I have attempted to capture in my visual notes) is that conflict, and the stress that accompanies it, are part of life. They are even essential to our survival. The key is not to avoid conflict, but to choose consciously the right strategy for addressing it. Whatever our personal style and sensitivity and that of the other party, whether more dove or more hawk, we often need to navigate between the two, depending on our goals and the context. Positioning oneself as a peacemaker, and actively practising and fostering peacemaking, particularly when leading a team, may well be the boldest approach. It is also, in many cases, the most effective way to address workplace conflict. Thank you to the organising team and all the participants for such an inspiring day. One that, in its own way, gave me hope for humanity.
On Friday 16 January 2026, I held the very first day dedicated to sketchnoting within the European institutions. The idea was simple: to celebrate sketchnoting with colleagues who had followed the StartSketch course, and with anyone curious about the practice.
For this first edition, Celia Pessaud kindly agreed straight away to organise it with me. We chose to keep things light and flexible. Colleagues could drop in at any time, without registration, and stay for as long (or as little) as they wanted. We offered a few simple and playful sketchnoting activities. We began with a warm-up to step away from daily work and reconnect with creativity. Then participants could choose what suited them: sketching their 2025 retrospective, their 2026 resolutions, their hopes and fears for 2026, a visual agenda, or contributing to a visual dictionary of EU jargon. We ended with a large mural where everyone could leave a trace: an avatar, a thought, or a quote.
The atmosphere was calm and relaxed, but also full of energy. Smiles quickly turned into quiet focus as people leaned over their paper and started sketching. Many told us they had barely practised sketchnoting since the course, but that the day gave them fresh motivation to start again. Others said that thinking visually helped them reflect differently, less linearly, and clarify their ideas. Several even suggested doing this every month.
So, what do I take away from this first EU Sketchnote Day?
First, it simply feels good for those who practise and for those who watch. It creates a different state of mind: more attention, better focus, stronger synthesis, and more creativity. And all this without needing to “know how to draw”.
I also realise that one day a year is not enough. The interest is clearly there. We will keep an annual celebration, but between those moments we could organise regular “Visual Fridays” to practise together around a theme or a concrete need. And we should keep building our shared visual dictionary.
Finally, what I treasure most is the reminder that I work with extraordinary colleagues. Starting with Célia, who supports all my visual ideas, and Catherine Focant, with whom I developed the introductory sketchnoting course.
If you’re not part of the EU bubble, you may not be aware that the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, has asked Commissioner Piotr Serafin to lead a large-scale review of the Commission’s organisation and operations, together with an external benchmarking exercise. The aim is to ensure that Europe has a modern, efficient public administration capable of delivering on its political priorities and improving the daily lives of Europeans.
Since April 2025, I’ve had the privilege of supporting, from time to time, the internal team working on this initiative. I contribute with the tools and capacities I know best, especially participatory facilitation and visual thinking, during consultation and reflection sessions with staff.
Last Friday, all European Commission staff were invited to a meeting, held onsite for some and online for most, where the main actors openly discussed the process behind the initiative. Among other things, they explained that the review seeks inclusiveness and collaboration to help shape a more agile, effective, and attractive Commission for the future. My role in this major event was to visually capture the key points from the discussions. For the first time, I worked from an interpretation booth, alongside the French and German interpreters, where my task was to “interpret” the room’s conversation into visual language.
My graphic recording was widely shared internally afterwards as part of the follow-up communication. The feedback I received, both privately and publicly, has been very positive and truly encouraging: colleagues highlighted how valuable visual harvesting is for complex, high-stakes discussions, appreciated the clarity and completeness of the capture, and praised how the visual summary distilled 1h15 of exchanges into a single, accessible image.
I’m proud to see how my practice of visual thinking, which includes graphic facilitation, sketchnoting, and graphic harvesting, has evolved from a tiny niche within the Commission more than 20 years ago to something now requested and used at high-level events. One of my greatest satisfactions is having helped bring this innovation into the Commission, equipping colleagues to think not only with text but also with hand-drawn visuals (icons, arrows, containers, etc.) for richer, broader and more inclusive reflection. I’m grateful to all those who believed in this approach, who had the courage to try visual thinking, and to everyone today who is keen to learn it.
The European Commission needs more creativity and innovative thinking to meet the complex challenges of today’s world. Visual thinking is a skill to be relearned, not just a tool, and it can help achieve this. This is my personal conviction and it is entirely my own opinion.
«De quels médias sociaux voulons-nous ? » était la question posée lors d’une conférence-débat citoyenne à laquelle j’ai eu le plaisir de participer. J’y suis allé avant tout pour écouter Luc De Brabandere, que j’admire pour sa pensée claire et sa façon d’aborder la technologie avec logique et profondeur. Ses propos résonnent particulièrement à une époque où la technologie façonne nos vies et où chacun a un avis sur tout, souvent sans en comprendre les fondements. Les échanges ont mis en lumière les dérives bien connues des médias sociaux : la propagation éclair des fausses « vérités »; l’enfermement dans des bulles d’opinion; l’amplification émotionnelle au service du buzz, et de certains intérêts, politiques ou économiques. D’entrée de jeu, les orateurs ont rappelé que le numérique est politique. Les médias sociaux ne sont pas neutres: ils portent (volontairement ou non) un projet idéologique. Les solutions existent, à plusieurs niveaux: individuelles (éducation, esprit critique, discernement) et institutionnelles (régulation, fiscalité, authentification numérique, etc.). Deux points m’ont particulièrement marqué: 1) l’importance d’une Europe forte pour réguler, légiférer et retrouver notre souveraineté technologique (étant donné que je travaille à la Commission Européenne, je ne peux qu’approuver et être rassuré par cette conclusion); 2) la nécessité de réapprendre à raisonner dès le plus jeune âge, pour mieux penser, mieux communiquer… et mieux agir.
Un grand merci à Luc de BrabandereLaurent HubletIsmaël Nuino , aux organisateurs, et au public pour leurs questions stimulantes. En images : mes notes visuelles, les orateurs et organisateurs, et la dédicace de Luc de Brabandere dans son livre Petite Philosophie des catégories inévitables.
I just completed the Inktober 2025 challenge! Thirty-one days and thirty-one prompts to draw (=the Inktober challenge during October), thirty-one one-line drawings made with a single black marker(my own challenge in the challenge).
Beyond the creative challenge, what I found most inspiring was being part of a global community of artists and sketchers, all working on the same idea, each in our own way, yet connected through the shared rhythm of daily creation. Seeing others’ works, exchanging encouragement, and feeling that collective support truly strengthened my sense of belonging.
A heartfelt thank you to everyone who followed, liked, or commented on Instagram and Bluesky, your engagement made this experience even richer. Until the next challenge, the marker will not stop, the inspiration continues, and the visual thinking does the same.
